I felt that justice was not shown at the end of the trial scene. I firmly believed that Shylock deserved his pound of flesh as stated in the bond taken by Antonio. However, Portia thought of loopholes in the bond and said how Shylock can have his pound of flesh but without any spillage of blood. I fins that its unfair for Shylock since everyone knows how the cutting of flesh would result in loss of blood and so there was no need to mention it, but Portia played with the words in the bond and prevented Shylock from getting his pound of flesh. Shylock was being spat at, criticized as a cut throat dog and a devil and he didn't get what he desired. Justice was not shown as Portia was merely finding laws to fight Shylock off although the ancient Venetian still stands.
Perhaps, the Jews at those time never got Justice.However, I feel that there is true mercy being demonstrated. Portia and the Duke have tried to many times in hope to change Shylock's mind and take 3 times the amount of ducats instead, but he refuses and said how he had swore to their holy Sabbath, that he wishes to have the pound of flesh and that although he's having a loss over here, he's still desires that pound of flesh to feed his hatred to Antonio. Shylock showed his vengeful nature throughout the whole trial scene as he repeatedly turned down every offer. The element of Mercy was finally showed when Shylock was forced to convert to Christianity and his land and money and at the same time almost lost his life. Perhaps Portia was also unwilling to do such a thing to Shylock.
I believe that she merely wants to save Antonio and leave Shylock unscathed so she kept on appealing to him but to no avail and she finally ran out of choices and said that Shylock should have more Justice than he should desire, before trapping him in order to save Antonio as her final resort. Justice and Law could be manipulated by people in power. Like the case in Merchant of Venice we see how the Duke of Venice said few words when Portia was speaking. Portia was disguised as a learned, young lawyer from Padua which Dr Bellario sent to take over him. Portia was the one who has the power to make the final verdict with only the Duke there as a representative of the Venetian Law to help grant Shylock's life. She bends the words and laws to slowly build her verdict. Moving to the moder world context,
here is a saying in China: “Power is greater than the law and often the rich and those with power and rank can often weasel their way out even serious crimes with bribes as long as they pay and give their money secretly to the jury or judge!" We have seen how even heirs of the famous people have been bailed out of jail so easily despite convicting serious offences. So, even Justice and Law could not be so upright and judge after all and because of the greed of people, even the most strongest foundation of Court can be easily toppled and Lady Justice would have to peel off her blindfold to see who is the villain and who the victim!
Hi Chun Yi , I agree with you that Portia was manipulative in finding loopholes in the contract and was also manipulative in twisting the Venetian laws to the Christians' advantage .
ReplyDeleteHowever , I would like to ask you if mercy and justice was really shown . If justice was really shown , Shylock would have gotten his pound of flesh as there was no need to state that blood could not be spilled as blood being spilled in a process of cutting Antonio would have to include spilling blood , which was a given . If mercy was really shown , Shylock would AT LEAST have gotten his loan back and gotten away without further persecution.
Next I would like to ask, you if Portia really did have any reservations or qualms about pushing Shylock into a corner . You have to understand the background when the play was written ! In those days , almost all Europeans were anti-semitic. It would have been humorous to see a Jew , in those days , being persecuted like this ! Portia only appealed for mercy because a fellow Christian's life was at stake . If the conditions were changed , and Shylock were to be the one being "killed" , do you think that anyone there would have actually pitied Shylock ?
Also , Portia did not take over Bellario. Portia disguised herself and went as Balthasar and consulted Bellario for the advice on how to deal with the case .
Lastly , I would like to comment on your diction and language . You might want to look through your post and check through your language to improve clarity .
Overall , I think you put in a lot of effort as this post is quite long , chock full of information and mostly correct in essentials .
- Lam Sze Tung
Is there really true mercy? Portia gave Shylock a long mercy speech but when she trapped shylock by her play of words, she did not give mercy to Shylock. Even when Bassanio offered Shylock 3x of the original, which (if she have mercy) she have the power to allow but she did not, is this really true mercy?
ReplyDeleteGreat analysis though
Hi, I am Darrel. Just something for you to re-ponder about, is there true mercy? Is it mercy to convert Shylock to a christian and make him lose his ability to fend for himself? Is it mercy to make him lose all his friends in minutes where he may not necessarily be accepted by the Christians then? I think the asnwer is no. Therefore, I think there is no true mercy in this context. Thanks
ReplyDeleteHey Chun Yi, I believe that, though the 3 speakers have raised points which I agree with, one could still see that there is this aspect of Portia which can be considered merciful.
ReplyDeleteLike you said, Portia begged Shylock to reconsider his decision. If Portia already knew how to play with the words, and the society's anti-semitism views, she would have defeated Shylock instead of going through the trouble to say the mercy speech. We must remember that her purpose of going to the trial was to help Bassanio to save Antonio. There was absolutely no way she is going to let Antonio die in the hands of Shylock.
On the other hand, when Shylock was the person asking for mercy, Portia, if she was that merciful anyway, could have just let Shylock go, instead of accusing him of attempted murder and taking away his assets and humiliating him that deeply. Maybe it is because Portia was irritated by the fact that she was turned down rudely by Shylock when she was pleading for mercy, thinking that Shylock is a hot-headed person who just cannot think straight.
Anyway, great analysis Chun Yi, I enjoyed reading your post :)
I think she was being cruel when she did that. She was trying to entrap him. I believe that to them, it was funny that Shylock actually believed that he was going to get justice. She was most likely intending to hurt him, just like the rest of the Christians in the story,
DeleteHi Chunyi, I believe that justice and mercy is in a grey area. It is subjected to different perspective. In the case of justice, in the view point of the christians, justice is met. However, in view point of Shylock , justice is not met. This can be applied to the mercy of Portia as well.
ReplyDeleteGreat analysis though:)
Hi Chun Yi, as many people have commented on the mercy aspect, I would like to comment on your justice aspect. I believe Shylock should be punished for attempting what could have been the murder of someone. In this case while it might look like a material exchange since it was called a bond, it was actually a murder plot. I mean, Shylock’s actions have the elements of a murder. Shylock had a motive and it was out of revenge. He had a weapon which was his bond. All these makes Shylock a murderer and so he should be punished.
ReplyDeleteActually i think that Shylock should not have craved for the pound of flesh to the extent that he did. He knows for himself that he wants it for the vengeance, and this makes it unjustifiable, as he himself tried to use the strictness of the law to get his revenge, and it is in itself an act of manipulating the law. This makes it deserving for Shylock to get punished as he did not want justice, but his revenge. I would say that it is justified for Portia to help Antonio because she knows that Shylock's motive was for revenge. However Portia should have given Shylock at least 3000 ducats as that was what he actually deserves, no less. He would have deserved more if he were to charge interest rates but was gracious enough not to, and by this account he should be let off with at least 3000 ducats, and not converted and have his fortune split into two pieces.
ReplyDelete